<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cost of social software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jonmell.co.uk/cost-of-social-software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jonmell.co.uk/cost-of-social-software/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 20:56:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Mell</title>
		<link>http://jonmell.co.uk/cost-of-social-software/comment-page-1/#comment-4278</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Mell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 12:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonmell.co.uk/?p=245#comment-4278</guid>
		<description>Hi Dan - I think IBM Connections is ~$110 / user for a one-off license (no charge for the server).  Part of the problem with Sharepoint is that the licensing can be horrifically complex (server, database, client access) and the man-hours involved in customising the thing to get it to be &#039;social&#039;.

I&#039;ve written some stuff on ROI (http://jonmell.co.uk/category/roi/) and Rob Gray (who works for BlueKiwi, a social software vendor) has as well.

The key cost saving for a &#039;social&#039; solution is not only in the license cost but the speed of deployment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dan &#8211; I think IBM Connections is ~$110 / user for a one-off license (no charge for the server).  Part of the problem with Sharepoint is that the licensing can be horrifically complex (server, database, client access) and the man-hours involved in customising the thing to get it to be &#8216;social&#8217;.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve written some stuff on ROI (<a href="http://jonmell.co.uk/category/roi/" rel="nofollow">http://jonmell.co.uk/category/roi/</a>) and Rob Gray (who works for BlueKiwi, a social software vendor) has as well.</p>
<p>The key cost saving for a &#8216;social&#8217; solution is not only in the license cost but the speed of deployment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Smith</title>
		<link>http://jonmell.co.uk/cost-of-social-software/comment-page-1/#comment-4266</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonmell.co.uk/?p=245#comment-4266</guid>
		<description>The cost of social software seems to vary quite a bit.  One pricing model for a hosted enterprise system that I heard from a reputable collaboration system supplier was &quot;roughly the cost of one full-time professional or $100K.&quot;
 Other systems (not SharePoint) seem to be in that range as well.
Looked upon on the basis of cost per employee or cost per customer/member, $500K might not be much.  However it seems that $100K for the system and hosting and $100K for the professional corporate comm person is a realistic target.  And yes, it very likely will be better than SharePoint.
  These days &quot;Nobody ever gets fired for buying IBM&quot; has too often been replaced by &quot;Nobody ever gets fired for buying Microsoft.&quot;  Since IBM is no slouch in social software they might look at IBM but I have no idea what IBM&#039;s pricing model is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The cost of social software seems to vary quite a bit.  One pricing model for a hosted enterprise system that I heard from a reputable collaboration system supplier was &#8220;roughly the cost of one full-time professional or $100K.&#8221;<br />
 Other systems (not SharePoint) seem to be in that range as well.<br />
Looked upon on the basis of cost per employee or cost per customer/member, $500K might not be much.  However it seems that $100K for the system and hosting and $100K for the professional corporate comm person is a realistic target.  And yes, it very likely will be better than SharePoint.<br />
  These days &#8220;Nobody ever gets fired for buying IBM&#8221; has too often been replaced by &#8220;Nobody ever gets fired for buying Microsoft.&#8221;  Since IBM is no slouch in social software they might look at IBM but I have no idea what IBM&#8217;s pricing model is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

