Enterprise 2.0 in the flow

There’s a great article by Dave Pollard about how an edict banning email might look.  In summary it looks like this:

  • For simple requests, use instant messaging
  • For working on documents use screen sharing
  • For FYI – post on e-library
  • For surveys/opinion gathering, use survey tool
  • For group training, use e-Learning

Whilst I wholeheartedly agree with the sentiment, I think this raises a question about whether or not Enterprise 2.0 tools need to be embedded into the existing workflow of employees.

Someone (apologies, I can’t remember who) told me that the real difference between Generation Y and the rest of the world was not that Gen Y was ‘good’ at technology and everyone else wasn’t, but that Gen Y had an intuitive understanding of which tool was best for any given situation.  If you show a traditional worker how to use a wiki and demonstrate that it is better (in some situations) than email, they will try to use the wiki for everything.  Most knowledge workers require one tool to do their job, they don’t want to have to think about what tool to use to communicate,  they want to communicate in the easiest way possible.

I’ve noticed this in my own behaviour.  If I see something interesting in Facebook I want to tell someone about, I’ll send them a message on Facebook.  If I happen to have Twitter open whilst thinking about contacting a colleague who is on Twitter, I’ll use Twitter to send them a direct message.  If Skype happens to be open as the thought crosses my mind, I’ll use Skype.

It takes a great effort to be contacted over one medium (say email) and reply via another (eg instant message).  It takes you out of your flow.

This is why infamous ‘reply-all’ email chains happen, because a user receives the message in email, they reply in email.

What has to happen is that all the tools mentioned above by Dave need to be in context.  I can live in my email client, if that email client also allows me to instant message / post documents to an on-line library etc. etc.

At Trovus, our email system prompts us if we send an attachment, asking if it is an internal email would it like the system to strip the attachment out, place it in our document library, and embed a link to the document in the email instead.  We can manage our document libraries completely from our email client, there is no real need to use the document library’s web interface if we don’t want to, we don’t have to break our flow.

This is where the next innovation in ’email’ clients come from, you already start to see it as Microsoft embed OCS instant messaging into Outlook, and IBM Lotus Notes becomes a collaboration platform, which happens to contain email.

In short, the tools should do the thinking for us as to which communication mechanism to use – they shouldn’t require us to think.

This entry was posted in Enterprise 2.0. Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Enterprise 2.0 in the flow

  1. Great post – you’ve hit the nail on the head. We certainly can’t expect people to jump around from one tool to another – they’ve got to be integrated. I think an effective mechanism to integrate social media and messaging functionality (without creating a big mess!) is the BIG missing link at the moment …

  2. jonmell says:

    Thanks Richard, I think that this is where the innovation / effort should be, rather than people trying to come up with the next Facebook or next Twitter…

  3. Steve Dale says:

    Jon,

    I don’t disagree with the general thrust of your argument, i.e. keeping the tools you use within the context of the business process. However, the last point you make (…the tools should do the thinking for us as to which communication mechanism to use – they shouldn’t require us to think) is arguably a utopian view and, certainly in my opinion, unlikely to happen. In fact, I was putting a presentation together yesterday for a group of people who we’re trying to encourage to get more involved in an on-line community, and one of my bullets read…”Live with the complexity; technology can’t solve everything”. So for me, I think we should strive to become more like Generation Y and learn how to use the tools in context until it becomes intuitive.

  4. Pingback: ibm live

  5. jonmell says:

    Steve – that’s a great point – it’s all about the enterprise pendulum! (http://jonmell.co.uk/enterprise-20-pendulum/) – it’s worthy of a separate blog post rather than a comment, I’ll twitter when written!

  6. Pingback: “I don’t do computers” is not an excuse | Jon Mell - Web 2.0 ideas and strategy

  7. Pingback: Steve Dale online » Enterprise 2.0 tools and the need for business context

  8. Pingback: Don’t make me think! | Jon Mell - Web 2.0 ideas and strategy

  9. Matthew P says:

    Hey Jon, rather than considering ‘Gen Y’, do you think it would be interesting to look at ‘Gen V’? (http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=721008)

Leave a Reply