<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Enterprise 2.0 in the flow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jonmell.co.uk/enterprise-20-flow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jonmell.co.uk/enterprise-20-flow/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 12:09:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matthew P</title>
		<link>http://jonmell.co.uk/enterprise-20-flow/comment-page-1/#comment-655</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 21:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonmell.co.uk/?p=137#comment-655</guid>
		<description>Hey Jon, rather than considering &#039;Gen Y&#039;, do you think it would be interesting to look at &#039;Gen V&#039;? (http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=721008)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Jon, rather than considering &#8216;Gen Y&#8217;, do you think it would be interesting to look at &#8216;Gen V&#8217;? (<a href="http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=721008" rel="nofollow">http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=721008</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don&#8217;t make me think! &#124; Jon Mell - Web 2.0 ideas and strategy</title>
		<link>http://jonmell.co.uk/enterprise-20-flow/comment-page-1/#comment-646</link>
		<dc:creator>Don&#8217;t make me think! &#124; Jon Mell - Web 2.0 ideas and strategy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonmell.co.uk/?p=137#comment-646</guid>
		<description>[...] a great afternoon with Headshift the other week, where I shared my thoughts about Enterprise 2.0 needing to be in the flow of existing collaborative tools.  I was challenged by Tom (blogs here) who made a strong case that collaboration always has [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a great afternoon with Headshift the other week, where I shared my thoughts about Enterprise 2.0 needing to be in the flow of existing collaborative tools.  I was challenged by Tom (blogs here) who made a strong case that collaboration always has [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Dale online &#187; Enterprise 2.0 tools and the need for business context</title>
		<link>http://jonmell.co.uk/enterprise-20-flow/comment-page-1/#comment-332</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Dale online &#187; Enterprise 2.0 tools and the need for business context</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonmell.co.uk/?p=137#comment-332</guid>
		<description>[...] interesting discussion over at Jon Mell&#8217;s blog about Enterprise 2.0 tools and the need for systems developers to consider business process context [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] interesting discussion over at Jon Mell&#8217;s blog about Enterprise 2.0 tools and the need for systems developers to consider business process context [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;I don&#8217;t do computers&#8221; is not an excuse &#124; Jon Mell - Web 2.0 ideas and strategy</title>
		<link>http://jonmell.co.uk/enterprise-20-flow/comment-page-1/#comment-329</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;I don&#8217;t do computers&#8221; is not an excuse &#124; Jon Mell - Web 2.0 ideas and strategy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonmell.co.uk/?p=137#comment-329</guid>
		<description>[...] Enterprise 2.0 in the flow  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Enterprise 2.0 in the flow  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonmell</title>
		<link>http://jonmell.co.uk/enterprise-20-flow/comment-page-1/#comment-327</link>
		<dc:creator>jonmell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonmell.co.uk/?p=137#comment-327</guid>
		<description>Steve - that&#039;s a great point - it&#039;s all about the enterprise pendulum! (http://jonmell.co.uk/enterprise-20-pendulum/) - it&#039;s worthy of a separate blog post rather than a comment, I&#039;ll twitter when written!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve &#8211; that&#8217;s a great point &#8211; it&#8217;s all about the enterprise pendulum! (<a href="http://jonmell.co.uk/enterprise-20-pendulum/" rel="nofollow">http://jonmell.co.uk/enterprise-20-pendulum/</a>) &#8211; it&#8217;s worthy of a separate blog post rather than a comment, I&#8217;ll twitter when written!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ibm live</title>
		<link>http://jonmell.co.uk/enterprise-20-flow/comment-page-1/#comment-324</link>
		<dc:creator>ibm live</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 11:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonmell.co.uk/?p=137#comment-324</guid>
		<description>[...] about whether or not Enterprise 2.0 tools need to be embedded into the existing workflow of employehttp://jonmell.co.uk/enterprise-20-flow/It Takes a Crisis ForbesLeaning on a surprising coach, Howard Stringer is partway through the Sony [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] about whether or not Enterprise 2.0 tools need to be embedded into the existing workflow of employehttp://jonmell.co.uk/enterprise-20-flow/It Takes a Crisis ForbesLeaning on a surprising coach, Howard Stringer is partway through the Sony [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Dale</title>
		<link>http://jonmell.co.uk/enterprise-20-flow/comment-page-1/#comment-321</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Dale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 07:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonmell.co.uk/?p=137#comment-321</guid>
		<description>Jon,

I don&#039;t disagree with the general thrust of your argument, i.e. keeping the tools you use within the context of the business process. However, the last point you make (...the tools should do the thinking for us as to which communication mechanism to use - they shouldn’t require us to think) is arguably a utopian view and, certainly in my opinion, unlikely to happen. In fact, I was putting a presentation together yesterday for a group of people who we&#039;re trying to encourage to get more involved in an on-line community, and one of my bullets read...&quot;Live with the complexity; technology can&#039;t solve everything&quot;. So for me, I think we should strive to become more like Generation Y and learn how to use the tools in context until it becomes intuitive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t disagree with the general thrust of your argument, i.e. keeping the tools you use within the context of the business process. However, the last point you make (&#8230;the tools should do the thinking for us as to which communication mechanism to use &#8211; they shouldn’t require us to think) is arguably a utopian view and, certainly in my opinion, unlikely to happen. In fact, I was putting a presentation together yesterday for a group of people who we&#8217;re trying to encourage to get more involved in an on-line community, and one of my bullets read&#8230;&#8221;Live with the complexity; technology can&#8217;t solve everything&#8221;. So for me, I think we should strive to become more like Generation Y and learn how to use the tools in context until it becomes intuitive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonmell</title>
		<link>http://jonmell.co.uk/enterprise-20-flow/comment-page-1/#comment-317</link>
		<dc:creator>jonmell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 16:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonmell.co.uk/?p=137#comment-317</guid>
		<description>Thanks Richard, I think that this is where the innovation / effort should be, rather than people trying to come up with the next Facebook or next Twitter...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Richard, I think that this is where the innovation / effort should be, rather than people trying to come up with the next Facebook or next Twitter&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Dennison</title>
		<link>http://jonmell.co.uk/enterprise-20-flow/comment-page-1/#comment-316</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Dennison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 16:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonmell.co.uk/?p=137#comment-316</guid>
		<description>Great post - you&#039;ve hit the nail on the head. We certainly can&#039;t expect people to jump around from one tool to another - they&#039;ve got to be integrated. I think an effective mechanism to integrate social media and messaging functionality (without creating a big mess!) is the BIG missing link at the moment ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post &#8211; you&#8217;ve hit the nail on the head. We certainly can&#8217;t expect people to jump around from one tool to another &#8211; they&#8217;ve got to be integrated. I think an effective mechanism to integrate social media and messaging functionality (without creating a big mess!) is the BIG missing link at the moment &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
